LENR is a family of systems that exhibit a wide range of effectiveness. Some of these systems are very week and others are strong. All these systems employ a set of technologies which number as large as one hundred. How these technologies are employed will dictate the power and the weaknesses of the system and therefore the usefulness of any given LENR system.
The LENR system reflects the designer of that system. The designer makes decisions about what technologies to use in his creation and how to apply those technologies. LENR is not a science, it is a collection of systems. LENR is not like superconductivity, but LENR may employ superconductivity as one of its component technologies or it may not. The enemies of LENR attack the designer of a given LENR system because that system is a projection of the judgment and knowledge of that designer. There are many types of aircraft. Some are supersonic and some are gliders. The designer has made technical decisions to meet the functions that the system was specified to meet. You can’t prove an aircraft. But you can show that an aircraft works or it doesn’t by a capabilities demonstration..Lenr is just like aircraft. Does that machine fly or not. For example, the enemies of the Papp engine always attack Joe Papp as a paranoid and wacko. They never attack the concept of cluster formation in a noble gas. An iron clad third party test that was enough to prove the Papp engine to the Patent office is not enough for the naysayers. The system that Joe Papp built must be flawed and could never work because Joe Papp was flawed. This same logic applies to Rossi and LeClair. The DGT system is flawed because DGT ran out of money. So that system could not have worked because the cost controls employed by DGT were tragically lacking. The naysayers want LENR to meet the open source requirements of science, They want to replicate them. But replication cannot be done because it is a system comprised of many sciences. And that proper combination of component parts are proprietary in industry. In this lies the dilemma of the clash of cultures that LENR suffers: science and engineering, A LENR designer can prove that some components of LENR work in a scientific experiment as I have showed on this thread, but LENR can only be proven as an singular effective system by competing in the marketplace. On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Friends, > > I have just published: > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/11/a-new-analogy-for-lenr.html > > It is a product of my autumn of discontent. The winter will be probably > much better and the spring excellent. > > Peter > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >
