Dear Lennart, Thank you- yours seeem to be the unique comment to my paper. Actuallly there are two parts; - the HBR paper - my system of 6 laws used for LENR - they were stated prior to reading the first, now I just have found the best names and the most natural taxonomy
I will try to find out the echo of the HBR paper that is actually about leadership- i am reading a lot in this area- as the papers recommended by Wally Bock plus many I believe in leadership. There is no leadership in LENR just some gurus trying to impose their opinions and solutions. Till now we have mainly pseudo-solutions from inside the community and Pareto solutions (80% reality and 20% myth) from outside it. (I am happy to see that you are using Pareto in thinking about LENR - I have described it in http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2012/11/80-of-all-truths-are-pareto-truths.html You are right, the great problem of the HBR paper is if those 7 (I have only 6) Laws are complete. Are they the best of all possibilities? This could be a very fine long discussion. My offer of laws and characteristics of LENR is baased on many years of thinking, of questions and answers- that became slowly very much different from and clearly alternative of the standard conformist in community answers.It seems thay are not acceptable and will be ignored. I dare to think they are to plausible and too reality smelling to be attacked directly in the name of some LENR certainties.In the LENR community even authoritative thinking (I call it post-logical in http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2011/03/modes-of-thinking-my-taxonomy.html Otherness of LENR?- No, it is nuclear, just nuclear and only nuclear. Complexity of LENR? OK it is not simple but if a fine theory will show how the Coulomb Barrier is defeated the way to an energy source is open and raher short- do not worry! Diversity of LENR? Later, perhaps; it was found in palladium and it works with deuterium, what else do you want, Pd is the best as myriads of results show it. There is no real problem of reproducibility, only ou see it. Metamorphosis of LENR? LENR + is just a fixa idea, a fantasy if the author. Nothing is sure re Rossi or DGT. Creativity of LENR? Shut up, Peter technology willstart only when we have a deep undesrtanding of this phenomenon, Science first, technology only later this is elementary. Dynamicity of LENR? Peter, are you not able to forget your wackky idea of Surfdyn - it si so old, from 1991? Fine exercise of applied schizofrenia- but I know why the paper will have no success. Peter On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with most of your statements, Peter. Although I am a born optimism > so I could word it differently:) > In this particular regard it is hard to be an optimist. > In another tread it has been discussed how to better sell the idea of > LENR. All parties hope for a shortcut - but there is none. > The management problem you compare to has the same dilemma and everybody > think that it must exist a shortcut. It does not. > I am not so sure those seven laws covers it all, but I am sure that more > than 80% (Pareto) and that is good enough. > The problem is of course that all the laws needs to be attended all the > time. That requires the ordinary virtues; hard work , tenacity, > integrity, knowledge, leadership, openness etc. etc. Often do we hope for > luck, theft, or other shortcuts. They do not work. > I can hear a constant analysis of what is wise to tell and how patents are > made a little wrong because otherwise someone will steal the idea. > Reality is that the idea cannot be stolen from a successful enterprise. > I know I will hear opposition for saying so, but reality is what you so > clearly explained. All ingredients need to be at hand to get > success. The information in the patent is only good for someone who has > all the other component. > I would say that in regards to LENR nobody has all the other components. > Unfortunately we do not exchange much info to correct the situation. > > Best Regards , > Lennart Thornros > > www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com > [email protected] > +1 916 436 1899 > 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 > > “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a > commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM > > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Dear Friends, >> >> I have just published: >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/11/a-new-analogy-for-lenr.html >> >> It is a product of my autumn of discontent. The winter will be probably >> much better and the spring excellent. >> >> Peter >> >> -- >> Dr. Peter Gluck >> Cluj, Romania >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com >> > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
