On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:49:43 -0500, Peter Amstutz wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:16:24PM -0500, Rob Meyers wrote:
>> In terms of your scripts section, it would be great to have a COM binding
>> to your api. Although this is pretty winders specific, it opens up all
>> your code to .Net. I've done some work with editing worlds while you are
>
> To be honest, I hate COM and our primary development platform has always
> been Linux, so it's not particularly high on the list of priorities.
> However, interoperability is going to be a strong focus of the next
> version, so some kind of COM binding may be down the road.
Conversely, on Linux, I have long wanted to have d-bus bindings, which
would achieve more or less the same effect. That is something that
probably will be in s5 out of the box -- you add a site extension
(assuming site extensions exist in s5; or whatever is the equivalent if
they don't), and you get d-bus, similar to how you get VIP.
best,
Lalo Martins
--
It doesn't bother me that people say things like
"you'll never get anywhere with this attitude". In a few decades, it
will make a good paragraph
in my biography. You know, for a laugh.
best,
Lalo Martins
--
It doesn't bother me that people say things like
"you'll never get anywhere with this attitude".
In a few decades, it will make a good paragraph
in my biography. You know, for a laugh.
--
http://www.laranja.org/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp key: http://www.laranja.org/pessoal/pgp
_______________________________________________
vos-d mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
