The Inquirer article mentions the GPL but I can't find any indication of licensing terms on Sun's own Project Darkstar page, except for the SDK download which appears to be a very restrictive "non-commercial" license. They say "open source" right on the first page, but I can't find any indication that they actually mean it.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:27:49AM -0700, HEBLACK, J wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 09:57 -0400, Peter Amstutz wrote: > > It's potentially interesting, although the details seem a bit thin at > > the moment -- there doesn't seem to be any obvious documentation on its > > architechture. It's also non-free software (in the GNU/FSF sense) which > > is a drag. > > Well here is maybe a better "vaporware" article which talks of darkstar > in terms of GNU and C++ and assembly wrappers: > Sun talks about Darkstar cunning plan > http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38137 -- [ Peter Amstutz ][ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ][ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [Lead Programmer][Interreality Project][Virtual Reality for the Internet] [ VOS: Next Generation Internet Communication][ http://interreality.org ] [ http://interreality.org/~tetron ][ pgpkey: pgpkeys.mit.edu 18C21DF7 ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ vos-d mailing list vos-d@interreality.org http://www.interreality.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/vos-d
