2016-05-11 10:47 GMT-06:00 Takahiro Ohkuma <[email protected]>:
> Dear Christoph
>
> Thank you very much for your prompt reply!
> I am doing short simulations becase I have not tried the numbers you
> suggested. I would like to share the results once I get them.
>
> I have seen a similar behavior when I made the dihedral potential through
> boltzmann inversion by using csg_boltzmann.
If this is happening in csg_boltzmann as well, it sounds like a
problem in the histogram class.

> At that time, I clipped the edges as a poorly sampled region.
>
> Takahiro
>
> 2016年5月11日水曜日 17時17分56秒 UTC+2 Christoph Junghans:
>>
>> 2016-05-11 4:35 GMT-06:00 Takahiro Ohkuma <[email protected]>:
>> > Dear all
>> >
>> > I am trying IBI for the bonded interactions of my polymer because the
>> > bonded
>> > potentials obtained by a single-chain simulation in vacuum did not well
>> > reproduce the bond distributions in the melt.
>> >
>> > According to the tutorial of "hexane/ibi_bonded", I made a setting.xml
>> > and
>> > prepared other files.
>> > But, at the calculation of dihedral distribution in the IBI steps, I
>> > always
>> > meet a strange sharp peak at an edge of the distribution (one data
>> > point) as
>> > the attached png file. This gives a sharp dihedral potential at the
>> > edge,
>> > and then the next simulation often diverges.
>> > Although I tried other values of <min>, <max>, and <step>, the situation
>> > did
>> > not changed.
>> > Is there any ways to manage this peak in the setting.xml?
>> Your settings.xml look correct to me!
>>
>> IBI for dihedrals isn't very well test and it looks to me there is an
>> issue with boundary conditions, i.e. dihedrals are periodic.
>> Did you try to set max=-min=2.5, or min=0.5 and max= 2pi-0.5?
>>
>> Looking at the distribution, it seems the bug is in csg_stat itself. I
>> guess the problem is here:
>> <https://github.com/votca/csg/blob/master/src/tools/csg_stat_imc.cc#L400>
>> It is marked as a TODO ;-)
>> However, the normalization should not matter as IBI does a ratio of
>> the distributions, but for the periodic histograms there might be a
>> round off error.
>>
>> Christoph
>>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Best regards
>> > Takahiro
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> > Groups
>> > "votca" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>> > an
>> > email to [email protected].
>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christoph Junghans
>> Web: http://www.compphys.de
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "votca" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



-- 
Christoph Junghans
Web: http://www.compphys.de

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"votca" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/votca.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to