> I know MUI's got many bugs and unimplemented features, but
> Reaction hasn't got half of MUI's power nor as it it's ease
> of programming.
Now you ARE kidding, aren't you?
Programming a MUI GUI is no different to programming a
Reaction GUI - it's all based on (and in fact Reaction
is simply new versions of) BOOPSI classes.
What is there to be easy? OM_GET, OM_SET blah blah blah..
No trouble at all. You could say that MUI's power is in
it's third party classes, but then until now you've
had to pay to get Reaction (ClassAct) includes and docs,
but you can get them for free now with OS3.5 and the
DevCD.
Either way, Voyager for Reaction is a no-no, especially
given Vapor's attitude to OS3.5 I'd think..
--
Matt Sealey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Distributed Systems Support
Computer Centre
University of Leicester
____________________________________________________________
Voyager Mailing List - Info & Archive: http://www.vapor.com/
For Listserver Help: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "HELP"
To Unsubscribe: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "UNSUBSCRIBE"
