Herbert Poetzl wrote:
Hi All!
If you would like to comment on c17f, which
is going to be released as vserver-1.0, please
do it now ...
Found no stability problems with it on an Athlon testing machine
together with util-vserver 0.23.92.
BUT: util-vserver does not comply with debian policy.
It does not honor the VSERVERS_ROOT variable in /etc/vservers.conf.
The /vservers/ path is hardcoded in several source files, but debian
wants to have the root dir of the vservers in /var/lib/vservers.
IMHO: There should be a big note not to compile the kernel with IPV6
support in the vserver-1.0 release, otherwise lots of people will end up
with an insecure system.
Will the development of vserver switch to kernel 2.6? Forward port of c17f?
--
lg, Chris
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
