On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 03:13:23PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 10:06:53AM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > > On Monday 09 August 2004 14:57, Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 01:49:19PM +0100, Lu�s Miguel Silva wrote: > > > > Hello dear list, > > > > > > > > I want to upgrade my servers to kernel 2.4.27 but there isnt a final > > > > 2.4.27 patch! :o) > > > > > > well, I wanted to avoid the 1.29 ooops, 1.30, oops 1.31 > > > fiasco this time, so I decided to put up some release > > > candidate, which I (if nobody else) will test during this > > > week ... > > > > I have it running since yesterday on a test machine > > which provides secondary services. > > Seems to behave like vs-1.27. > > okay, good, my tests didn't show any regression > either, so I'm going to release it as vs1.29 > today or tomorrow ...
oops, spoken too fast ... a few minutes after that we managed to spot a permission issue which should now be fixed in rc2 ... best, Herbert > thanks for testing, > Herbert > > > -- > > lg, Chris > > _______________________________________________ > > Vserver mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
