On 2007.01.22 22:01:59 +0100, Markus Schuster wrote: > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > >> I had no problems patching older 2.6.16 kernels with XEN and > >> vserver, but with the more recent one, the latest available vserver > >> patch for 2.6.16 (patch-2.6.16.20-vs2.0.2-rc22.diff) does not apply > >> without dozens of rejects that I can't fix myself. > > > > I take it that you are actually volunteering to test > > such a kernel with and without Xen meshed in ... > > I think I can't follow your thoughts here :) Should I try to patch a vanilla > 2.6.16.37 with patch-2.6.16.20-vs2.0.2-rc22.diff or what do you mean? > I'm also ready to test a pre-made 2.6.16.37 with XEN and vserver patches > applyed as long as it won't eat up my server :)
It basically means "I would create a patch for you, iff you promise to actually test it and give feedback etc.". There were quite a few feature requests in the past where those who "filed" them simply disappeared, thus Bertl tries to make sure that such a thing does not happen before he starts working on stuff that is not of interest for the majority of users. HTH Björn _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
