On Monday 22 January 2007 22:39, Björn Steinbrink wrote: > On 2007.01.22 22:01:59 +0100, Markus Schuster wrote: > > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > >> I had no problems patching older 2.6.16 kernels with XEN and > > >> vserver, but with the more recent one, the latest available vserver > > >> patch for 2.6.16 (patch-2.6.16.20-vs2.0.2-rc22.diff) does not apply > > >> without dozens of rejects that I can't fix myself. > > > > > > I take it that you are actually volunteering to test > > > such a kernel with and without Xen meshed in ... > > > > I think I can't follow your thoughts here :) Should I try to patch a > > vanilla 2.6.16.37 with patch-2.6.16.20-vs2.0.2-rc22.diff or what do you > > mean? I'm also ready to test a pre-made 2.6.16.37 with XEN and vserver > > patches applyed as long as it won't eat up my server :) > > It basically means "I would create a patch for you, iff you promise to > actually test it and give feedback etc.". There were quite a few feature > requests in the past where those who "filed" them simply disappeared, > thus Bertl tries to make sure that such a thing does not happen before > he starts working on stuff that is not of interest for the majority of > users.
Count me in if you need people to test a vserver 2.0.x patch for the vanilla 2.6.16.x kernel. Best regards, Bert. > HTH > Björn > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
