On Sunday 01 April 2007 12:33, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
dumb question..... i didnt see it in the changelog but then again i may not know what i am looking at :) 1. will production vserver code soon have real 127.0.0.1 unique to each guest? this is something that is sorely needed to prevent hours of possibly insecure workarounds with some software. 2. this looks like the production version of what we are currently running... util-vserver 0.30.212-r2 kernel 2.6.19-vs2.2.0-rc2 I suspect an upgrade to production would not hurt us considering our kernel version.. i guess my question is would it be a seamless upgrade for us to production? i would probably bump the kernel to 2.6.20 at the same time. > > Greetings Community! > > after a longer rc stage, to get rid of all the > minor issues, we proudly present the first release > of the new stable 2.2 branch, which includes all > the 'considered stable' features of the previous > devel branch (2.1.x) which has been superceded by > the 2.3.x devel branch ... > > http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_rel26/v2.2.0/ > (tools supposed to work fine on Mandriva 2007.x) > > thanks to all who helped in development and did > test the release candidates ... > > enjoy, > Herbert > > _______________________________________________ > Vserver mailing list > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver > -- Chuck "...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended upon me in their anger, and asked 'Why do you not get the viruses or the BlueScreensOfDeath or insecure system troubles and slowness or pay through the nose for an OS as *we* do?!!', and I answered...'I use Linux'. " The Book of John, chapter 1, page 1, and end of book _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
