First, thanks a lot Herbert for your hard work and support ! This new
stable version is a great news !

Like Chuck, I've ran in a lot of programs (especially in the VOIP
domain) that requires hack to work around with 127.0.0.1:
asterisk
freepbx
phpmyadmin (for some small features I don't recall)
flashoperator panel
bind (related to pam something)
sendmail (don't remember what options)

I don't remember anymore but I've had problems with another half dozen.

Imho, the "127.0.0.1" issue is by far the most painful for a newbie.


Sincerely,

Adrien













On 4/1/07, Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 03:15:37PM -0400, Chuck wrote:
> On Sunday 01 April 2007 12:33, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
>
> dumb question..... i didnt see it in the changelog but then
> again i may not know what i am looking at :)
>
> 1. will production vserver code soon have real 127.0.0.1
>    unique to each guest?

probably, I guess 2.2.1 will have that ...

>    this is something that is sorely needed to prevent hours
>    of possibly insecure workarounds with some software.

I am not aware of many software packages which
would require any changes to work with the
current implementation (in this regard)

> 2. this looks like the production version of what we are
>    currently running...

> util-vserver 0.30.212-r2
> kernel 2.6.19-vs2.2.0-rc2

> I suspect an upgrade to production would not hurt us considering our
> kernel version.. i guess my question is would it be a seamless upgrade
> for us to production?

I hope so ...

> i would probably bump the kernel to 2.6.20 at the same time.

2.6.19.7 and 2.6.20.4 should be both fine, but
a lot of minor issues were ironed out between
rc2 and final (rc21+ :) same goes for the tools
btw, which are at 0.30.213-rc6

HTC,
Herbert

> > Greetings Community!
> >
> > after a longer rc stage, to get rid of all the
> > minor issues, we proudly present the first release
> > of the new stable 2.2 branch, which includes all
> > the 'considered stable' features of the previous
> > devel branch (2.1.x) which has been superceded by
> > the 2.3.x devel branch ...
> >
> > http://www.13thfloor.at/vserver/s_rel26/v2.2.0/
> > (tools supposed to work fine on Mandriva 2007.x)
> >
> > thanks to all who helped in development and did
> > test the release candidates ...
> >
> > enjoy,
> > Herbert
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Vserver mailing list
> > Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> > http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
> >
>
> --
>
> Chuck
>
> "...and the hordes of M$*ft users descended upon me in their anger,
> and asked 'Why do you not get the viruses or the BlueScreensOfDeath
> or insecure system troubles and slowness or pay through the nose
> for an OS as *we* do?!!', and I answered...'I use Linux'. "
> The Book of John, chapter 1, page 1, and end of book
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Vserver mailing list
> Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
> http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver





--
Adrien Laurent
Chief Information Officer
(514) 284-2020 x 202
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.modulis.ca

Technical questions? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver

Reply via email to