I think this discussion established that the middle two changes were unnecessary. Indeed the comment #1 just above it says "we can use this item name, since it was valid in that time" suggesting that when that comment was written someone was aware the item could have been deleted.
Ok, I have thought about this a little longer, esp. in respect to the 2 patched lines that regard projects, where the item is deleted, as non valid. As you state above, and also the comment in the code, this item pathes are valid. I would like to extend this: "they are valid, but not the best choice, if there are other non deleted pathes". So I would propose to first check for contexts, where the item is not deleted and if we can't find one, we will fall back to a deleted path.
Dirk _______________________________________________ vss2svn-users mailing list Project homepage: http://www.pumacode.org/projects/vss2svn/ Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Admin: http://lists.pumacode.org/mailman/listinfo/vss2svn-users-lists.pumacode.org Mailing list web interface (with searchable archives): http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.vss2svn.user
