Hi,
I just finished some work to migrate the webdav provider from slide to
jackrabbit using the patch from James Dumay. Slide leaked some file
handles and is an unsupported project. In the process I added some
more tests around transfer listeners as some providers weren't
registering them correctly.
Jason suggested on IRC that it might be better to retain the slide
webdav provider as-is and move the new code to wagon-webdav-jackrabbit.
Any opinions on this before I go ahead and do that?
I'm thinking of still renaming the slide wagon to wagon-webdav-slide
in such a case, so that on upgrading the version they are forced to
choose, but still have access to the slide one if needed.
The only issue I can see is it clashing with the other one built in to
2.0.9 for the plexus 'dav' component, but I haven't tried to see if it
wins out correctly if used.
BTW, I've also brought the SCM provider in to trunk from the sandbox -
it's apparent from JIRA that a number of people are using it, so I
think we should support it for the limited use cases it currently
supports.
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
