On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:26 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 22/05/2008, at 12:03 PM, Nathan Beyer wrote:
>
> Currently, my organization is utilizing the default provider, so we'll
>> have
>> to add additional bits to all of our POMs to take advantage of the
>> provider
>> that's NOT of the EOL path. The default provider for WebDAV is on EOL,
>> correct? Will the jackrabbit provider eventually become the default
>> provider?
>>
>
> You'd need to do that anyway to change the version, right?
>
I don't know, would you? I'm using a POM with no reference to a WebDAV other
than use 'dav:' URLs in the deployment section, so the provider is just
being chosen for me. I assumed that as I upgrade the core maven tool (eg
2.0.9 to 2.0.10), updates to the providers would just come along if pulled
in. Before 2.0.9, I was adding this to the build section.
<extensions>
<extension>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-webdav</artifactId>
</extension>
</extensions>
Doesn't that just pull in the latest version?
>
>
>
>>
>> I'd be more amenable to Jason's thinking if there was at least a loose
>> plan
>> for what's going to happen, but frankly I'm still skeptical.
>>
>
> This is the discussion to come up with that plan :)
>
> Sorry, I hadn't seen your other message before I last posted. But this is
> what I propose:
> - rename to webdav-jackrabbit
> - have no -webdav module in the final release
>
The final release of what? The core maven package?
>
> - make sure wagon-webdav 1.0-beta-2 works with the new API, but discourage
> it's use
>
> WDYT?
>
> The wagon
>> development/community is so isolated, non-responsive and slow I'm
>> skeptical
>> of anything going on here. Does wagon development discussion only happen
>> on
>> IRC?
>>
>
> There wasn't anything going on here. That's why I'm currently going through
> all the issues, and posting to the list with anything controversial.
>
> I hope that if we have a 1.0 release, and JIRA is not full of old issues
> that you can't see the forest for the trees, it'll be easier to respond to
> patches and such as they arrive. Thanks for the patches you personally
> submitted, btw - and sorry we didn't get to them sooner.
>
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
