Al Winslow wrote:
>
>
> rod/christine wrote:
>
>
> > Tell me, then - were you serious when you suggested that the Americans
> > lob 10-12 (nuke-tipped) Tomahawks into Lebanon?
> >
> > Or were you jes' funnin' the list?
> >
> -----------------------------
>
> Nuclear weapons are an option. I'm not talking about "lobbing" nukes in
> a random way. The Bakaa Valley is full of terrorist encampments.
> 10-megaton thermonuclear warheads wouldn't be appropriate, but areas
> could be bracketed with smaller warheads in the low-kiloton range,
> killing great numbers of evildoers and preventing their doing harm to
> our country. I expect the president will choose conventional forces but
> it could be done quicker and cheaper with a dozen Tomahawks carrying
> what they were originally designed to carry. Using
> million-dollar-per-copy cruise missiles to deliver piddly little
> 800-pound conventional high explosive warheads doesn't get you much bang
>
> for the buck.
===
Hi Al.
Are you 100% serious?
I confess, been on this list (lurking!) for a while but hadn't started
reading on a regular basis till earlier this year. It went dead for a
month - so started posting an URL link - now and then - to start some
conversation.
I thoroughly enjoy! reading others opinions, etc. I've terrible typing
skills and what comes out doesn't always translate too well. I type
with my index fingers only - and the mind races at 100+ mph. My grammar
is horrible so cut me... some slack?
If you need some clarification - ask me to clean up the sentence or
whatever. Thanks.
I had been going thru old posts that I had missed or ignored, for
whatever reasons. And came upon your "Theory Of Blasting The Lebanese
Homeland" and found it of interest. [smile]
I should tell you, that I'm from North Dakota, and have an ICBM
Minuteman III (3 warhead), residing within the confines of my property.
It's about 3/4 mile from the house and been there for 40 years - early
1960's. My (late) Dad owned the land at that time, of course.
Some parts of my military "experience" I can't really talk about, only
to say that my Army Infantry Company (combat engineer battalion) handled
back-pack nukes (1950's variety) to take out an airstrip, hydro dam, you
know the deal. My MOS Advanced Training was as a light-wheeled
vehicle-driver, jeeps, 5/4's, 2&1/2 tons, and 5-ton trucks. Well, I was
offered more interesting line of duty and "quick" promoted to Spec-4 &
eventually to Command (buck) Sergeant. Was fairly Gung Ho! back then.
[fierce look] And cross-trained into battlefield nukes and even
"witnessed" an underground explosion (nuke) at a Nevada field - as part
of the "total package" of training. Probably why i joined that area of
military - from looking at the missile complex - out in the pasture all
those years growing up & visiting with the Air Force soldiers doing
their thing (servicing site). However, the cattle avoided the area like
the plague and the badgers would have nothing to do with that spot of
ground, birds too.
Okay - Lebanon (bekaa) is no place to blast weapons of 1-kiloton or
threshold nukes. The topography & wind currents would send the
radiation "raining down" on Israel Proper. We can't have that now, can
we. Since Israel hasn't used their nukes - no reason for Uncle Sam to
risk the ensuing mayhem - India & Pakistan would go bonkers on each
other.
With so many countries now possessing - there'd be a domino chain of
events. It just wouldn't go, Al.
My last comment on nukes is the French Connection. Their submarines are
the spookiest of all - and they are the "unknown factor" as they are
more than an arms-length from sharing maneuvers and position guidance
systems. They perfected the Abadon in their series of nuke bomb tests
in the South Pacific isles (underground) in 1997. Even the US knows
little of this technology. The French Subs cruise the waters off the
coast of USA & regularly chased off - and my opinion is they (French
Gov't) can NEVER be trusted.
The French are the unknown wildcard (undercover) player in the Middle
East Intrigues. Watch them - their politics is swinging to the very
"far" right. Bigtime.
Neutron maybe...?
Microwave Beam Weapons - would do a much better "job" at cleaning out
_the terrorists_, if you will. It would literally drive them nuts. It
had been used during the Gulf War and on Cyprus with quality success.
The Brits developed the technology that had been "invented" by N. Tesla
and first begun (tested) by the German Nazi's to heat food for their
troops.
If the list doesn't mind too much, i've an extremely interesting URL to
pass along. No, no Feds will come a-knockin' if you open it - they've
never cared for me tho.
I maintain a healthy distrust of The Government -
The Seen AND Unseen One.
We have a few dairy cows that need milking, so i'll end it here.
ps- pardon the syntax
Have a good morning, Al
Ideas move the world - not bombs
Regards,
Rod
warning: It's dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
fight the power
.
___________________________________________________________
Check out http://clik.to/sf for other lists to join.
A93MR48T18
==^================================================================
This email was sent to: archive@jab.org
EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?b1dhdK.b1tdRU
Or send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!
http://www.topica.com/partner/tag02/register
==^================================================================
