Am Mittwoch, 15. November 2006 16:50 schrieb Giel van Schijndel: > >> Am Mittwoch, 15. November 2006 10:37 schrieb Giel van Schijndel: > >> So you proposal for the license file? > >> > > > > I was at school at the time of writing that mail so didn't had a lot of > > time. > > Attached however I have a proposal. > > > > If you have any form of (constructive by preference) criticism on it, > > please do say so. > > > > PS My keyboard is dying so there might be some typos in there > > (especially the b and n characters, independently from case that is). > > > > -- > > Giel > > > > Ahum, I forgot to attach the file: here it is. > > -- > Giel > license.txt > The source code of Warzone 2100 is released and distriuted under the > terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License (see > [GPL-filename-here] for details). > > note: > The original release of Warzone 2100 explicitly states that the sources are > released under the GPL. The data files however are mentioned in the > document releasing the sources under GPL, it however does not explicitly > states that the data files are released under the same conditions. Thus > this leaves the legal state of these uncertain. It is however generally > assumed that the intention of Pumkin Studios (the original developers) is > to place both under GPL conditions.
> The Warzone2100 Resurrection Project is > currently working on receiving clarity regarding this subject. Per: What do you think? Is that ok? I am unsure... On one hand it seems sensible and the only logical ending. On the other one it nearly promises something which might take a long while to come true... Besides that: The text sounds good so far, even though I'd shorten it a bit in the beginning if you don't mind. --Dennis
pgphjfcOKBz5o.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
