Am Sonntag, 3. Dezember 2006 10:52 schrieb Christian Vest Hansen: > At least it looks like a clear strategy. > > And we have in good faith reckoned that the data is also distributed > under the terms of the GPL, right? So a "relicensing" must mean that > everything that make up the game as a whole, is GPL, which in turn > means that we need no special disclamer. It's all just GPL, nothing > more, nothing less. > That's how I read this "relicensing" in a nutshell: just remove the > disclamer about the data and how we interpreted the readme. > > We don't need to consider contributors because all contributions are > already GPL, and we don't need to consider Game Company X, because > *they* messed up the licensing and releasing, and *they* are the > reason that we need to interpret and reflect on the terms and > conditions (T&C), and *we* have done everything in our power to both > clarify and live up to their T&C, and thus *they* must be at fault if > we, in their oppinion, don't live up to their T&C, because *they have > had the oppotunity to clarify, but they didn't use it!* > > That's how I see our status quo: it's all just GPL. Sounds like an idea, but how do we tell that the distributors without adding a "disclaimer" or whatever else you call the text stating our interpretation? ;)
--Dennis
pgpTtiGyfMjhE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
