On Tuesday, 26 December 2006 at 20:45, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 26. Dezember 2006 15:54 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> > On Tuesday, 26 December 2006 at 11:26, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, 26. Dezember 2006 02:57 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> > > > I see you have merged most fixes into 2.0.5, thanks for that, I was
> > > > thinking about bringing that up again. Just curious why you didn't
> > > > include the gamma patch.
> > >
> > > It was split into 1001 pieces and I didn't want to bother with that. ;)
> >
> > Hey, that was why I sent one unified patch for that! :)
> You said something like "unified patch _may_ be attached" or similar. I
> couldn't find it, so I didn't bother with it... Sorry.
It was attached to that mail (the "may" was just because I tend to
forget to actually attach files, and if I add something like that, I'm
more likely to remember actually attaching the file before sending the
mail), something like "backporting fixes", sent on Dec 3, 3:51.
> > > If we fix the Radeon issue in a short amount of time, you might want to
> > > apply it yourself to the 2.0 branch, so it gets into 2.0.6.
> >
> > You know, last time I checked, I wasn't a member of the gna project :)
> :(
?
> > > (2.0.6 wont exist if the Radeon issue is not fixed fast.)
> >
> > You mean bug 7308? I have a Radeon 9600 with the mesa driver, and I
> > didn't want to bother with the binary stuff... What do you need to
> > install for that? A kernel module and the X driver, right? Perhaps I'll
> > try and see what happens (and hope it doesn't mess my system up...).
> Here on Gentoo I'd need to install "x11-drivers/ati-drivers", switch the GL
> implementation to ati and change my xorg.conf to use
> Driver "fglrx"
> (If I would have a ATI card installed and the 8.29 (R200) drivers would be
> compatible to the 2.6.19 kernel. :( )
I'm just downloading the 50 MB installer thingy from ATi, I hope I can
install that manually to remove it all again when I'm done...
Oh, and why won't there be a 2.0.6 without the Radeon fix? Is it perfect
in all other ways? I think there should be a steady stream of 2.0.x
releases with small fixes or improvements until there is a 2.1 that can
be released, to keep the project appearing on news sites. By the way,
has someone submitted 2.0.5 to happypenguin.org and linuxgames.com yet?
It didn't appear there yet.
--
i dont even know if it makes sense at all :) This is an experimental patch
for an experimental kernel :))
-- Ingo Molnar on linux-kernel
_______________________________________________
Warzone-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
