Am Mittwoch, 27. Dezember 2006 02:56 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> On Tuesday, 26 December 2006 at 20:45, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, 26. Dezember 2006 15:54 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> > > On Tuesday, 26 December 2006 at 11:26, Dennis Schridde wrote:
> > > > Am Dienstag, 26. Dezember 2006 02:57 schrieb Christian Ohm:
> > > > > I see you have merged most fixes into 2.0.5, thanks for that, I was
> > > > > thinking about bringing that up again. Just curious why you didn't
> > > > > include the gamma patch.
> > > >
> > > > It was split into 1001 pieces and I didn't want to bother with that.
> > > > ;)
> > >
> > > Hey, that was why I sent one unified patch for that! :)
> >
> > You said something like "unified patch _may_ be attached" or similar. I
> > couldn't find it, so I didn't bother with it... Sorry.
>
> It was attached to that mail (the "may" was just because I tend to
> forget to actually attach files, and if I add something like that, I'm
> more likely to remember actually attaching the file before sending the
> mail), something like "backporting fixes", sent on Dec 3, 3:51.
Well, sorry again. I must have overlooked it...
>
> > > > If we fix the Radeon issue in a short amount of time, you might want
> > > > to apply it yourself to the 2.0 branch, so it gets into 2.0.6.
> > >
> > > You know, last time I checked, I wasn't a member of the gna project :)
> > >
> > :(
>
> ?
>
> > > > (2.0.6 wont exist if the Radeon issue is not fixed fast.)
> > >
> > > You mean bug 7308? I have a Radeon 9600 with the mesa driver, and I
> > > didn't want to bother with the binary stuff... What do you need to
> > > install for that? A kernel module and the X driver, right? Perhaps I'll
> > > try and see what happens (and hope it doesn't mess my system up...).
> >
> > Here on Gentoo I'd need to install "x11-drivers/ati-drivers", switch the
> > GL implementation to ati and change my xorg.conf to use
> > Driver "fglrx"
> > (If I would have a ATI card installed and the 8.29 (R200) drivers would
> > be compatible to the 2.6.19 kernel. :( )
>
> I'm just downloading the 50 MB installer thingy from ATi, I hope I can
> install that manually to remove it all again when I'm done...
>
> Oh, and why won't there be a 2.0.6 without the Radeon fix? Is it perfect
> in all other ways?
It's far from being perfect, but we don't have anything we could put into a 
2.0.6 release...

> I think there should be a steady stream of 2.0.x 
> releases with small fixes or improvements until there is a 2.1 that can
> be released, to keep the project appearing on news sites. By the way,
> has someone submitted 2.0.5 to happypenguin.org and linuxgames.com yet?
> It didn't appear there yet.
I submitted it to linuxgames.com, but they seem to not like me or the game or 
whatever. Like with the 2.0.4 release they did not show anything about it...
linux-gamers.net has a news entry, but with far outdated screenshots...
I didn't yet write to the penguin...

Attachment: pgpJwkE5k5MG8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Warzone-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev

Reply via email to