On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Per Inge Mathisen schreef: >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Giel van Schijndel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> Sure, but do we want to change every single [lexer interpreted] file format >>> to Lua? >> >> Why not? :-) >> >> I guess some can just plain be retired, like the animation lexer, >> which WZM will obsolete entirely. > > Actually rather than asking ourselves "why not?", I prefer to ask [for > each format we want to change] "why should we use Lua instead?". As long > as we use that approach (and are capable of answering that question with > something more like "Lua rocks.", "Lua is cool.", etc.) I don't mind > using Lua. > > My main concern was just that ^^, I don't want to change every single > format to Lua just because we can.
I thought it was obvious due to the context of this discussion, but the main reason I want to use lua is to get rid of the dependencies on flex and bison. They are a maintenance nightmare. - Per _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
