Am Dienstag, den 23.09.2008, 14:51 +0200 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
> Hello WZRP, hello Per!
> 
> Am Dienstag, 23. September 2008 13:05:58 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> > One idea: How about using just one repository, but shaped like this:
> >
> > trunk/
> > branches/
> > tags/
> >
> > then a next level (example from inside trunk):
> >
> > trunk/code/
> > trunk/data/
> > trunk/originals/
> >
> > so if you wanted to download the latest of all, you would do svn up on
> > trunk, while if you wanted to just grab a new code branch, you'd do
> > svn up on trunk/code only.
> Sound good, too.

Hi all

i like per's idea (in an artist's point of view)
trunk/data
trunk/code
originals/
...

looks somehow better than
trunk/
trunk/data/
originals/
...

and imo better than
code/trunk
code/branches
code/tags
data/trunk
data/branches
data/tags
originals/

and you simply can checkout trunk/ and have everything you need, if you
only want to update source, go in code and update it..

i'm not for seperate repositories, code works with data and it should be
consistent each revision.

> The data-for-game repos could be autogenerated from the data
> repository 
> regularly. (Cronjob, buildbot, ...)
> So data-creators would work on the "originals" in the data repository, and 
> would not have to care about converting every piece themselves.
i would like to keep originals for work-in-progress, unfinished things,
models don't have to be updated very often.
with the (future) pie converter it isn't that difficult to do it every time

regards elio


_______________________________________________
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev

Reply via email to