On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 12:26 PM, buginator <buginato...@gmail.com> wrote: > First off, 2.2.4 should be dead. Really. > It serves no useful purpose for us at all. > The codebase has changed too much, so any bug reports we get on this > version is pretty much meaningless in the vast majority of the cases. > We should update trac to have 2.2.4 listed as "unsupported", since it > is just that. > We should update the front page to "strongly encourage" people to use > the 2.3 series of releases, instead of a version we no longer support.
We are already planning on dropping 2.2.4 support right when 2.3.0 is released. Are you proposing to drop it earlier, so that for a few weeks we will have exact zero supported stable releases? I'm sorry, but I don't like that idea. I don't think any other software company has done that, ever, which should be the first clue that perhaps it's a bad idea. Is there anything wrong with continuing to support 2.2.4 nominally, like we do now? It's really a rather minimal amount of extra work; I mean, when's the last time we've gotten a 2.2.4 bug report? -Zarel _______________________________________________ Warzone-dev mailing list Warzone-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
