Why is that subject changing all the time? :P

Anyway, i have to correct, sorry about my English:
What did you mean with this "probably best to avoid that name for now"
exactly?

Jarmo

On Apr 6, 9:32 pm, Jarmo Pertman <jarm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, as i understood, then Taza just offers extra functionality and
> in deep within Watir and RSpec is used for it. But as i already
> mentioned, then WatiRspec is not doing much extra except combining
> both of these tools. And this is enough for my work.
>
> What did you mean about this "probably best to avoid that name for
> now" exactly?
>
> Jarmo
>
> On Apr 6, 3:23 am, Charley Baker <charley.ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Hey Jarmo,
>
> >     No worries. Watirspec isn't a gem yet, but may be at some point,
> > probably best to avoid that name for now. Taza's more complex to some
> > degree, but the basics are fairly simple. Interested to hear more about your
> > point of view and how you see it, or anyone else for that matter. Let me
> > know. :)
>
> > Cheers,
>
> > Charley Baker
> > Lead Developer, Watir,http://watir.com
> > QA Architect, Gap Inc Direct
>
> > On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Jarmo Pertman <jarm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi.
>
> > > You are correct, i didn't know anything about these projects. But as
> > > far as i looked on Taza's documentation right now, then i can say that
> > > it is a completely different library. It might have a similar idea at
> > > some degree, but Taza seems to be just a lot more complex with all
> > > those extra features, which are not needed for me. I don't plan to
> > > make WatiRspec like that. WatiRspec's main idea is that it takes RSpec
> > > and Watir and just makes it easier to use both of these tools together
> > > by providing some helper methods and that's mainly it.
>
> > > I haven't been very original in thinking of names, thus i named it
> > > like Watir + RSpec = WatiRspec
>
> > > Sorry, if i caused any troubles with that.
>
> > > Jarmo
>
> > > On Apr 3, 10:27 pm, Charley Baker <charley.ba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > How is this different from Taza?http://github.com/charley/tazawhichdoes
> > > > exactly the same sort of thing. watirspec is the name of Jari's rspec
> > > tests
> > > > for celerity and watir, so despite the fact that it's not a gem yet, I'd
> > > > cede that name to him. Let me know if I'm offbase, maybe you didn't know
> > > > about these projects. :) I'd be happy to have you involved in Taza.
>
> > > > Cheers,
>
> > > > Charley Baker
> > > > Lead Developer, Watir,http://watir.com
> > > > QA Architect, Gap Inc Direct
>
> > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Jarmo <jarm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hello.
>
> > > > > I just wanted to let you know that I've released my first gem called
> > > > > WatiRspec. It does combine Watir and RSpec for you so you could start
> > > > > testing easily and write less code. I created it because i noticed
> > > > > that i'm reinventing these things all the time if new client/project
> > > > > is started. Now it's much easier. Just enter few commands and i'm
> > > > > ready to start. I'm going to use it in my everyday work. It is going
> > > > > to be part of my diploma thesis also.
>
> > > > > It is very fresh library, so it's possible that something doesn't work
> > > > > as it should - although i have written tests for my code :)
>
> > > > > What do you think? Do you see any shortages? Might it be useful for 
> > > > > you
> > > at
> > > > > all?
>
> > > > > You can read more about it athttp://github.com/jarmo/WatiRspec
>
> > > > > You can read about some of the principles (haven't had the time to
> > > > > update it yet with newest ideas) from my blog too:
> > > > >http://www.itreallymatters.net
>
> > > > > Jarmo Pertman
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > Before posting, please readhttp://watir.com/support. In short: search
> > > > > before you ask, be nice.
>
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to
> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
> > > > > To post: watir-general@googlegroups.com
>
> > > > > To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
>
> > > --
> > > Before posting, please readhttp://watir.com/support. In short: search
> > > before you ask, be nice.
>
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
> > > To post: watir-general@googlegroups.com

-- 
Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before 
you ask, be nice.

You received this message because you are subscribed to 
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
To post: watir-general@googlegroups.com

Reply via email to