are there plans to merge this branch that the group is working on, back
into the main taza repository and out as a gem. I want to use this in
another testing situation, and while it's possible to install taza and
replace the files, it's just not scalable.

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:26 PM, weimar <[email protected]> wrote:

> ah. So you can run either the cucumber part or the taza part? So
> potentially I couldn't write specs and then cucumber half would still run?
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, bis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> if you look at the whole thing the idea is the page objects
>> the cucumber features use the taza framework pages and flows
>> the rspec tests also use the taza framework pages and flows
>>
>> It sort of gives you an idea of how you can use the taza framework they
>> are testing for the exact same things just in 2 different ways
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:14 AM, weimar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> last question.
>>>
>>> In your example, you use some bits of cucumber. May i ask what you get
>>> by adding that layer of functionality. As far as I can see that the step
>>> definitons aren't used in any of the specs?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:50 PM, bis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> taza doesnt work for 1.9 we have not made the changes to make it work
>>>> with that version of ruby
>>>>
>>>> if you use bundler you add a gemfile something similar to this
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> source :rubygems
>>>>
>>>> gem 'taza', :git => '[email protected]:hammernight/taza.git'
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> gem 'cucumber'
>>>> gem "watir",   :platforms => [:mingw, :mswin]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> then when you run your rake task you would need to use
>>>> bundle exec rake since its using a different version of rake that is not 
>>>> the newest
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:48 PM, weimar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Which gemfile?
>>>>>
>>>>> Have the commands to run the the rakes changed?
>>>>>
>>>>> Would there be issues If i was using ruby 1.9.1?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:40 PM, bis <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> No it will not. It is forked from taza but not merged if you did want
>>>>>> to use it you would have to build your own gem or use bundler
>>>>>> adding this to your gemfile would work
>>>>>> gem 'taza', :git => '[email protected]:hammernight/
>>>>>> taza.git'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> as far as the rakefile goes i will have to look at that rspec too i
>>>>>> have been using rspec spec but if you use bundler you can do bundle exec
>>>>>> rake and see if that makes a difference
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i have an example of using taza here and it works fine
>>>>>> ruby 1.8.7 and watir  but you can also modify this a bit and make it
>>>>>> use watir-webdriver just change the config and require it
>>>>>> https://github.com/hammernight/etsy_cucumber_taza_tutorial
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:29 PM, hillary <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> while i have someone involved here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this fork completely ready to use? Like if i ran the gem
>>>>>>> update/install taza would i be given this branch? I download the zip 
>>>>>>> file
>>>>>>> and replaced the contents in the taza folder in my gem library with the
>>>>>>> contents from this folder. When I try to run a rake i get this error:
>>>>>>> c:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/taza-0.8.7/lib/extensions/object.rb:2:in
>>>>>>> `<top
>>>>>>> (required)>': uninitialized constant Object::VERSION (NameError)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short:
>>>>>>> search before you ask, be nice.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
>>>>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short:
>>>>>> search before you ask, be nice.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  --
>>>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short:
>>>>> search before you ask, be nice.
>>>>>
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search
>>>> before you ask, be nice.
>>>>
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
>>>> [email protected]
>>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search
>>> before you ask, be nice.
>>>
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search
>> before you ask, be nice.
>>
>> [email protected]
>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>

-- 
Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before 
you ask, be nice.

[email protected]
http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general
[email protected]

Reply via email to