you would add that line to your gemfile for bundler then do a bundle install and it will get the source and build the gem for you http://gembundler.com/
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 10:45 AM, weimar <weimar1...@gmail.com> wrote: > i don't really need 1.9.x support yet, they're fine with me using 1.8.7 > until 1.9.x is supported. > > k. I'll add that line. It's to the taza gemfile correct? > > I do really like the framework, so i hope it you come to a decision soonish. > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:47 AM, bis <bis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> well we are actively working on the Hammernight branch of taza(which >> is has a branch now that works with 1.9.2) I have spoken to Charley >> and as far as I know the short answer is no but if you are using >> bundler you can use the hammernight taza like this >> >> gem 'taza', :git => 'g...@github.com:hammernight/taza.git' >> >> if you need 1.9.2 support you can add this to the end of that line for >> now until we figure out where this is going. either merged back or >> branched off as a new gem >> :branch => '19-support' >> >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:36 PM, weimar <weimar1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > are there plans to merge this branch that the group is working on, back >> > into >> > the main taza repository and out as a gem. I want to use this in another >> > testing situation, and while it's possible to install taza and replace >> > the >> > files, it's just not scalable. >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:26 PM, weimar <weimar1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> ah. So you can run either the cucumber part or the taza part? So >> >> potentially I couldn't write specs and then cucumber half would still >> >> run? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, bis <bis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> if you look at the whole thing the idea is the page objects >> >>> the cucumber features use the taza framework pages and flows >> >>> the rspec tests also use the taza framework pages and flows >> >>> >> >>> It sort of gives you an idea of how you can use the taza framework >> >>> they >> >>> are testing for the exact same things just in 2 different ways >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:14 AM, weimar <weimar1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> last question. >> >>>> In your example, you use some bits of cucumber. May i ask what you >> >>>> get >> >>>> by adding that layer of functionality. As far as I can see that the >> >>>> step >> >>>> definitons aren't used in any of the specs? >> >>>> >> >>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:50 PM, bis <bis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> taza doesnt work for 1.9 we have not made the changes to make it >> >>>>> work >> >>>>> with that version of ruby >> >>>>> >> >>>>> if you use bundler you add a gemfile something similar to this >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> source :rubygems >> >>>>> gem 'taza', :git => 'g...@github.com:hammernight/taza.git' >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> gem 'cucumber' >> >>>>> gem "watir", :platforms => [:mingw, :mswin] >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> then when you run your rake task you would need to use >> >>>>> bundle exec rake since its using a different version of rake that is >> >>>>> not the newest >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:48 PM, weimar <weimar1...@gmail.com> >> >>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Which gemfile? >> >>>>>> Have the commands to run the the rakes changed? >> >>>>>> Would there be issues If i was using ruby 1.9.1? >> >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:40 PM, bis <bis...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> No it will not. It is forked from taza but not merged if you did >> >>>>>>> want >> >>>>>>> to use it you would have to build your own gem or use bundler >> >>>>>>> adding this to your gemfile would work >> >>>>>>> gem 'taza', :git => 'g...@github.com:hammernight/ >> >>>>>>> taza.git' >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> as far as the rakefile goes i will have to look at that rspec too >> >>>>>>> i >> >>>>>>> have been using rspec spec but if you use bundler you can do >> >>>>>>> bundle exec >> >>>>>>> rake and see if that makes a difference >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> i have an example of using taza here and it works fine >> >>>>>>> ruby 1.8.7 and watir but you can also modify this a bit and make >> >>>>>>> it >> >>>>>>> use watir-webdriver just change the config and require it >> >>>>>>> https://github.com/hammernight/etsy_cucumber_taza_tutorial >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:29 PM, hillary <weimar1...@gmail.com> >> >>>>>>> wrote: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> while i have someone involved here. >> >>>>>>>> Is this fork completely ready to use? Like if i ran the gem >> >>>>>>>> update/install taza would i be given this branch? I download the >> >>>>>>>> zip file >> >>>>>>>> and replaced the contents in the taza folder in my gem library >> >>>>>>>> with the >> >>>>>>>> contents from this folder. When I try to run a rake i get this >> >>>>>>>> error: >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> c:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/taza-0.8.7/lib/extensions/object.rb:2:in >> >>>>>>>> `<top >> >>>>>>>> (required)>': uninitialized constant Object::VERSION (NameError) >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: >> >>>>>>>> search before you ask, be nice. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> watir-general@googlegroups.com >> >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general >> >>>>>>>> watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> -- >> >>>>>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: >> >>>>>>> search before you ask, be nice. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> watir-general@googlegroups.com >> >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general >> >>>>>>> watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> -- >> >>>>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: >> >>>>>> search >> >>>>>> before you ask, be nice. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> watir-general@googlegroups.com >> >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general >> >>>>>> watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: >> >>>>> search >> >>>>> before you ask, be nice. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> watir-general@googlegroups.com >> >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general >> >>>>> watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: >> >>>> search >> >>>> before you ask, be nice. >> >>>> >> >>>> watir-general@googlegroups.com >> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general >> >>>> watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search >> >>> before you ask, be nice. >> >>> >> >>> watir-general@googlegroups.com >> >>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general >> >>> watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search >> > before you ask, be nice. >> > >> > watir-general@googlegroups.com >> > http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general >> > watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> > >> >> -- >> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search >> before you ask, be nice. >> >> watir-general@googlegroups.com >> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general >> watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > -- > Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search > before you ask, be nice. > > watir-general@googlegroups.com > http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general > watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > -- Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before you ask, be nice. watir-general@googlegroups.com http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general watir-general+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
