i don't really need 1.9.x support yet, they're fine with me using 1.8.7 until 1.9.x is supported.
k. I'll add that line. It's to the taza gemfile correct? I do really like the framework, so i hope it you come to a decision soonish. On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:47 AM, bis <[email protected]> wrote: > well we are actively working on the Hammernight branch of taza(which > is has a branch now that works with 1.9.2) I have spoken to Charley > and as far as I know the short answer is no but if you are using > bundler you can use the hammernight taza like this > > gem 'taza', :git => '[email protected]:hammernight/taza.git' > > if you need 1.9.2 support you can add this to the end of that line for > now until we figure out where this is going. either merged back or > branched off as a new gem > :branch => '19-support' > > > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 3:36 PM, weimar <[email protected]> wrote: > > are there plans to merge this branch that the group is working on, back > into > > the main taza repository and out as a gem. I want to use this in another > > testing situation, and while it's possible to install taza and replace > the > > files, it's just not scalable. > > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:26 PM, weimar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> ah. So you can run either the cucumber part or the taza part? So > >> potentially I couldn't write specs and then cucumber half would still > run? > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:19 PM, bis <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> > >>> if you look at the whole thing the idea is the page objects > >>> the cucumber features use the taza framework pages and flows > >>> the rspec tests also use the taza framework pages and flows > >>> > >>> It sort of gives you an idea of how you can use the taza framework they > >>> are testing for the exact same things just in 2 different ways > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:14 AM, weimar <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> last question. > >>>> In your example, you use some bits of cucumber. May i ask what you get > >>>> by adding that layer of functionality. As far as I can see that the > step > >>>> definitons aren't used in any of the specs? > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:50 PM, bis <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> taza doesnt work for 1.9 we have not made the changes to make it work > >>>>> with that version of ruby > >>>>> > >>>>> if you use bundler you add a gemfile something similar to this > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> source :rubygems > >>>>> gem 'taza', :git => '[email protected]:hammernight/taza.git' > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> gem 'cucumber' > >>>>> gem "watir", :platforms => [:mingw, :mswin] > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> then when you run your rake task you would need to use > >>>>> bundle exec rake since its using a different version of rake that is > >>>>> not the newest > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:48 PM, weimar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Which gemfile? > >>>>>> Have the commands to run the the rakes changed? > >>>>>> Would there be issues If i was using ruby 1.9.1? > >>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:40 PM, bis <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> No it will not. It is forked from taza but not merged if you did > want > >>>>>>> to use it you would have to build your own gem or use bundler > >>>>>>> adding this to your gemfile would work > >>>>>>> gem 'taza', :git => '[email protected]:hammernight/ > >>>>>>> taza.git' > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> as far as the rakefile goes i will have to look at that rspec too i > >>>>>>> have been using rspec spec but if you use bundler you can do > bundle exec > >>>>>>> rake and see if that makes a difference > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> i have an example of using taza here and it works fine > >>>>>>> ruby 1.8.7 and watir but you can also modify this a bit and make > it > >>>>>>> use watir-webdriver just change the config and require it > >>>>>>> https://github.com/hammernight/etsy_cucumber_taza_tutorial > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 9:29 PM, hillary <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> while i have someone involved here. > >>>>>>>> Is this fork completely ready to use? Like if i ran the gem > >>>>>>>> update/install taza would i be given this branch? I download the > zip file > >>>>>>>> and replaced the contents in the taza folder in my gem library > with the > >>>>>>>> contents from this folder. When I try to run a rake i get this > error: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > c:/Ruby192/lib/ruby/gems/1.9.1/gems/taza-0.8.7/lib/extensions/object.rb:2:in > >>>>>>>> `<top > >>>>>>>> (required)>': uninitialized constant Object::VERSION (NameError) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: > >>>>>>>> search before you ask, be nice. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general > >>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: > >>>>>>> search before you ask, be nice. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general > >>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: > search > >>>>>> before you ask, be nice. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general > >>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: > search > >>>>> before you ask, be nice. > >>>>> > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general > >>>>> [email protected] > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: > search > >>>> before you ask, be nice. > >>>> > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general > >>>> [email protected] > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search > >>> before you ask, be nice. > >>> > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general > >>> [email protected] > >> > > > > -- > > Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search > > before you ask, be nice. > > > > [email protected] > > http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general > > [email protected] > > > > -- > Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search > before you ask, be nice. > > [email protected] > http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general > [email protected]<http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general%[email protected]> > -- Before posting, please read http://watir.com/support. In short: search before you ask, be nice. [email protected] http://groups.google.com/group/watir-general [email protected]
