Hi Tad,

I have been thinking a bit and I have some doubts ..

It seems you just only want to get WiaB as "it is" and create a "working
software"
and is not the focus for this Project to work independently on
Specifications for Wave or really to support
others potential implementations to push this technology forward.

I think Specs will be developed as WiaB evolve and not the reverse, it's ok,
is one way...

If this is the case, this simplify everything, I want to apoplogise to
create this small mess in the
list, but I think our offer is not really align with your Project Focus and
Effort, (at least today, who knows in the future).

We believe on Wave Technology and to make it broadest available as possible
to the maximum number
of developers and users independently if they are from Java, Microsoft, Go,
Phyton and/or want to use
Socket.IO, XMPP, HTTP, WCF, Web Services or any other technology/language to
use and implement Wave
Technology.

If I'm wrong, maybe is intereting to continue this dicussion, if I'm less or
more right is not a problem, and I think
is not really worthy to anyone to spend time on this dicussion anymore.

ah, if we continue with dicussion we must take in consideration Andrus
advice and change thread name :) (sorry Andrus)

Jesus Salas
wave-vs.net CTO











On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Tad Glines <tad.gli...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Jesus Salas <jesus.sa...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > 1) C#.Net XMPP Client
> >
>
> Do you mean an XMPP component library, similar to Openfire's Whack library?
>
>
> > 2) C#.Net Wave Client Libraries (integrated with XMPP Client)
> >
>
> Does this include the OT code?
> WiaB doesn't use XMPP for the client/server protocol, it uses protobufs
> over
> WebSockets (or Socket.IO). Perhaps the meaning of "client" is lossing
> something in the translation?
>
>
> > 3) C#.Net Rich Text Wavelet Editor (ala Google Wave) (use c#.Net Wave
> > Client
> > Libraries)
> >
>
> It looks like this could all add up to a C# based WiaB client. Is that what
> you intend?
>
> -Tad
>

Reply via email to