I only can say ... +1
jesus On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Chris Harvey <ckhar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Seems to me we are (already) seeing "WIAB" verses "Wave" confusion > starting. > > This is what I feared when we were discussing whether the specs should be > part of Apache. As Torben pointed out, "Apache Wave" is really "Apache > WIAB". > > The specs should stay as waveprotocol.org. Those interested (in > particular) > in wave server development would be part of a community that develops ideas > around the specs. > > "Apache WIAB" should then follow the specs (if WIAB is indeed to be seen as > a "Reference Implementation"). > > There should also be a recognition that the so-called specs are effectively > nothing of the sort. They are a good, yet disconnected, out-of-date, at > times confusing, set of white papers that need considerably more work > before > other server developers can get really stuck-in. > > = 2c > > -- > Chris > iotawave.org > Singapore >
