It's at an early stage at the moment, but progressing well and gaining support. It's all new people now. -- [email protected]
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 06:04 +0100, "Paul Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote: > I was wondering how the rewrite of pygowave was going > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Adrian Cochrane <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Fri, 22 April, 2011 21:44:25 > Subject: Federation, multiple servers > > hello there, > I am the manager of PyOfWave (https://github.com/alcinnz/PyOfWave/), the > successor of PyGoWave. > > I hear you have been discussing whether the federation protocol is worth > putting in version 1.0, and as a 3rd party server, I'd give you a > defiant "yes, it is worth it." > > Also, I would like to suggest that we get a better standards system, as > I see the existing one as being very poor at the moment. I'd like to see > it using Wave, and a limited federation server (so as not to sure > favoritism), but any results on that would come from discussion. > > Thank you for your consideration. > -- > [email protected] > > -- > http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and > love email again -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and love email again
