Great news!
Maybe then it worth to wait with code migration...

2011/5/23 Paul Lindner <[email protected]>

> Apache is working on a way to officially support git:
>
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/infrastructure/trunk/projects/git/THE-PLAN-SO-FAR
>
> If you want git instead of svn then I'd suggest helping get the outstanding
> tickets resolved.
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:34 AM, Ali Lown <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, I don't see anyway for apache to setup a git repository.
> > Their whole system is based around SVN. The best they seem to be able
> > to offer is a git mirror[0]
> >
> > [0]:http://git.apache.org/
> >
> > 2011/5/23 Daniel Danilatos <[email protected]>:
> > > I like the hg->git part! :)
> > >
> > > Στις 23 Μαΐου 2011 2:43 π.μ., ο χρήστης Yuri Z <[email protected]>
> > έγραψε:
> > >> Regarding hg->svn migration:
> > >> I was lately investigating how to proceed with It and it seems like
> the
> > best
> > >> way is first to convert from mercurial to git, and then from git to
> svn.
> > >> Here are the links: hg->git
> > >> http://hivelogic.com/articles/converting-from-mercurial-to-git/
> > >> <http://hivelogic.com/articles/converting-from-mercurial-to-git/>git
> ->
> > svn
> > >> : http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/ImportingFromGit
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2011/5/22 Michael MacFadden <[email protected]>
> > >>
> > >>> All,
> > >>>
> > >>> Now that we are rolling on Jira, I think it's time to start thinking
> > about
> > >>> migrating to the apache SVN.  Can we set a goal timeframe for this?
>  To
> > do
> > >>> this I would recommend any one who is working on a large outstanding
> > project
> > >>> in their own workspace to try to wrap those up.  We probably want a
> > fairly
> > >>> stable and complete snapshot to move over to avoid disrupting peoples
> > work.
> > >>>
> > >>> We'll also need to think about how we handle code reviews since
> apache
> > has
> > >>> ReviewBoard set up by default.  Some have voiced a preference for
> > sticking
> > >>> with Rietveld.  I suppose this is an option, however we might need to
> > move
> > >>> the review site off of waveprotocol.org since that site will
> > eventually
> > >>> not be for WiaB development.  We should compare and contrast Review
> > Board as
> > >>> well.  Thanks.
> > >>>
> > >>> ~Michael
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Paul Lindner -- [email protected] -- linkedin.com/in/plindner
>

Reply via email to