Hi Guys,

I haven't been able to invest much time on wave... found it the code too
cumbersome to work with... but thats a long rant I won't bother with.

I just keep tabs on the development of the project. I was only interested in
the OT part of it and it was not documented and lack of documented
client/server protocol didn't help! GWT was the final deal breaker :D

But when I left wave for and started looking for something else, I found
many things on the way... but the one that took my attention was
http://opencoweb.org/

An OT framework, both for Python and Java with a lot of documentation and a
well defined Javascript client API and a proper documented client/server API
based on Bauyex.

I hope it can help to establish a good client server protocol base for
others too.

Regards,
Rohit

The diamond cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without
trials
http://mytechrantings.blogspot.com


On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I wondered if there was any interest again in helping push forward a
> stable client/server protocol for wiab?
>
> A few weeks back there was a thread started
> (
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201106.mbox/thread
> ),
> which then developed into a interesting discussion on protocols for
> wave (and wave-like) systems in general.
>
> However, the original intention (at least, from my perspective) of
> trying to push for a simple c/s interface for wiab...allowing anyone
> to write a client and connect to any standard wiab server.....seemed
> to have been lost.
> So I wondered if anyone was up for trying to work on it? I'm willing
> to help out as much as I can - although I'm mostly a java client
> coder, with little knowledge of the inner code of wiab. I could mock
> up basic clients to test the protocol with a lot easier then making
> wiab modifications. However, in either case, I'm willing to learn and
> put in the time if it means getting this functionality added.
>
> I'm assuming any c/s for wiab will be still based around there proposal
> here;
> http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol/design-proposals/clientserver-protocol
>
> -Thomas Wrobel
> arwave.org
>
>
>
> ~~~~~~
> Reviews of anything, by anyone;
> www.rateoholic.co.uk
> Please try out my new site and give feedback :)
>

Reply via email to