A great way to familiarize yourself with WIAB is by comepleting
StarterProject<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=labels+%3D+StarterProject>
.

2011/7/9 Joseph Gentle <jose...@gmail.com>

> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> As far as I know, the client-server protocol for wave in a box is
> >> pretty stable at this point. Its documented here:
> >>
> http://www.waveprotocol.org/protocol/design-proposals/clientserver-protocol
> >> ... Though that documentation is probably out of date.
> >
> > It was my understanding it wasnt yet implemented?
> > There was an older thread here about it;
> >
> >
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201105.mbox/%3cbanlktimi_a6zkpsrxqqvhwysrfhh35-...@mail.gmail.com%3e
> >
> > David Hearnden there said;
> >
> > "I would strongly encourage not building too much on the current
> protocol,
> > since it has a number of known limitations.  The new protocol is simpler
> and
> > achieves a better separation of functionality. "
> >
> > Which put me off doing a anything with the code as-is.
> >
> > Has this changed now?
>
> I don't know - I haven't been working with the wave in a box code for
> the last 6 months or so.
>
> >> If you care about the client/server API enough to dig through the
> >> code, writing up some proper documentation describing what you find
> >> would be great.
> >
> > Id be happy to - but that might be overestimating my skills somewhat.
> > My java skills uptill now have purely been GWT or Android based stuff.
> > Haven't ever done any server stuff, and the wiab code is a rather
> > steep learning curve every time I try getting to grips with bits of
> > it.
>
> I worked with the wave / wave in a box code for about half a year, and
> I still feel like that whenever I dive in there. Despite referring to
> (& editing) those protobuf files maybe a dozen times, it still took me
> 5-10 minutes to find them again. You can still get work done with that
> feeling, but it is slow going.
>
> If you want a good client/server protocol for wiab, familiarise
> yourself with the WIAB code and implement those changes Hearnden was
> talking about.
>
> -J
>
> > -Thomas
> >
>

Reply via email to