I'm reading since as per the Mailing Archive Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:53:19 GMT And I'm still reading and now I realy want to be part of it I'll find a way to fit in believe me. Merci Apache dev-Wave John & all.
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 for maven, happy to provide feedback on module names etc. Hopefully this > helps make the code a little clearer as well... > > Thanks > Angus Turner > angusisf...@gmail.com > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Pratik Paranjape < > pratikparanj...@gmail.com > > wrote: > > > +1 Michael. I think maven will turn out to be a big necessity in long > run. > > We are going to have many modules eventually, > > starting on right track can be helpful. Also from marketing standpoint, > its > > fashionable to provide just the artifact list to get going. > > > > I am not good with maven goals, but may be over time we can write the > build > > and federation test scripts. As we have > > all seen, Its not easy to manually setup everything at present. I wonder > > how may have given up just at the setup phase, > > never even opening a java file further. I had spent first 4 days just > going > > through code and running it in Eclipse avoiding > > to set it up. > > > > Relevant to current state, time permitting I will be able to contribute > > with GWT, GWT for HTML5 and Server java. Not so > > good with UI, not a designer. > > > > Additionally, if we add platforms in long run, I can work on: > > > > - Node > > - Scala (Play/Akka) > > - Python > > - Mongo and Redis > > > > ( If I had to design Wave today, I would have chosen 2 and 4.) > > > > > > Warm regards, > > Pratik. > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Michael MacFadden < > > michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > If we have some interests, I would be more than happy to re-engage with > > PP > > > and get that maven transition done. While it's not a huge step I think > > it > > > will entice developers. > > > > > > ~Michael > > > > > > On 5/30/13 10:41 AM, "John Blossom" <jblos...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >Thomas, > > > > > > > >Specific to my objectives RE your skills, I would appreciate a hand > with > > > >making a kick-butt video for the Wave pitch. Not now, but at the right > > > >time. > > > > > > > >RE the right tool for some of the project communications, I have to > say > > > >it, > > > >some of these processes might work really well in Wave...just sayin'. > > > > > > > >John > > > > > > > >All the best, > > > > > > > >John Blossom > > > > > > > >On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com> > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > >> Is there any suggested way to organize volunteers? > > > >> > > > >> I know the current method is basically a "todo" list isnt it? which > is > > > >>fine > > > >> in itself. > > > >> But possibly having a list of commiters together with notes of their > > > >> skillset could also help. > > > >> > > > >> I can, for example do the following; > > > >> > > > >> * client side GWT coding. > > > >> * Android/Java coding > > > >> * php > > > >> * 3d graphics and animations (possibly to help > presentations/diagrams) > > > >> * film editing > > > >> * html > > > >> > > > >> I haven't a clue when/if any of these things would be usefull - but > I > > > >> wouldn't mind being put on a list for anyone to contact if Wave > > related > > > >> help is needed in those areas. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > Forget node.js or any other "world-changer-wannabe" frameworks. As > > > >> Michael > > > >> > states, most developers don't understand (or are even scared of) > > this > > > >> > project architecture/structure. Fixing this would be a great > start! > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> +1 > > > >> > > > > >> > I tried to contribute to Wiab, a pretty simple UI modification, > and > > I > > > >> found > > > >> > myself lost in the code a few hours, nagging poor yuri with > > questions, > > > >> > before I could do anything simple (being new to modern web > > > >>development, > > > >> > gwt, etc was of no help either). > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> +1 > > > >> I also tried to do the same thing. Despite being very familiar with > > both > > > >> Java and GWT, and a few web-apps behind me, I still struggled. > > > >> > > > >> I haven't seen the codebase in almost a year now, however. > > > >> > > > >> Would it benefit from some very simple first steps....like better > > > >> commenting? removing redundant/legacy stuff? > > > >> > > > >> If separating the client is a step too big for anyone to commit too > > > >>right > > > >> now, there might still be more basic messures to help move the > > existing > > > >> codebase to something easier to deal with. > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Alain Levesque Wavewatchers Wavyemailbeta:* * *Web Page <http://albonobo.com/> *
