And git is an option now. Upayavira
On Thu, May 30, 2013, at 10:33 PM, Bruno Gonzalez wrote: > (uh, I had not read the other new thread, sorry for my redundant email) > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Bruno Gonzalez <sten...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 7:41 PM, John Blossom <jblos...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> RE the right tool for some of the project communications, I have to say > >> it, > >> some of these processes might work really well in Wave...just sayin'. > >> > > > > About this specific point, if you are suggesting to use wave as a > > discussion medium, I'm all for it, but unfortunately this was already > > discussed back when wave entered apache: there are some political > > constraints that force us to use the mailing list for discussions (as well > > as a subversion repo as authoritative source code store instead of git, the > > jira tracker instead of our own wave-based tracker, etc). We'll have to > > settle with this archaic mailing list technology for discussions even > > though for us (wavers) it... how to put this politely... it sucks big time > > :-D > > > > -- > > Saludos, > > Bruno González > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com > > http://www.stenyak.com > > > > > > -- > Saludos, > Bruno González > > _______________________________________________ > Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com > http://www.stenyak.com
