Hi Alain, A great way to start would be to look at the wiki here<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Home>. There are a number of TODOs at the top of most pages and if you could help out with those that'd be great!
Thanks Angus Turner angusisf...@gmail.com On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Alain Levesque <albon...@wavewatchers.org>wrote: > I'm reading since as per the Mailing Archive > Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:53:19 GMT > > And I'm still reading and now I realy want to be part of it I'll find a way > to fit in believe me. Merci Apache dev-Wave John & all. > > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Angus Turner <angusisf...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 for maven, happy to provide feedback on module names etc. Hopefully > this > > helps make the code a little clearer as well... > > > > Thanks > > Angus Turner > > angusisf...@gmail.com > > > > > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Pratik Paranjape < > > pratikparanj...@gmail.com > > > wrote: > > > > > +1 Michael. I think maven will turn out to be a big necessity in long > > run. > > > We are going to have many modules eventually, > > > starting on right track can be helpful. Also from marketing standpoint, > > its > > > fashionable to provide just the artifact list to get going. > > > > > > I am not good with maven goals, but may be over time we can write the > > build > > > and federation test scripts. As we have > > > all seen, Its not easy to manually setup everything at present. I > wonder > > > how may have given up just at the setup phase, > > > never even opening a java file further. I had spent first 4 days just > > going > > > through code and running it in Eclipse avoiding > > > to set it up. > > > > > > Relevant to current state, time permitting I will be able to contribute > > > with GWT, GWT for HTML5 and Server java. Not so > > > good with UI, not a designer. > > > > > > Additionally, if we add platforms in long run, I can work on: > > > > > > - Node > > > - Scala (Play/Akka) > > > - Python > > > - Mongo and Redis > > > > > > ( If I had to design Wave today, I would have chosen 2 and 4.) > > > > > > > > > Warm regards, > > > Pratik. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Michael MacFadden < > > > michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > If we have some interests, I would be more than happy to re-engage > with > > > PP > > > > and get that maven transition done. While it's not a huge step I > think > > > it > > > > will entice developers. > > > > > > > > ~Michael > > > > > > > > On 5/30/13 10:41 AM, "John Blossom" <jblos...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > >Thomas, > > > > > > > > > >Specific to my objectives RE your skills, I would appreciate a hand > > with > > > > >making a kick-butt video for the Wave pitch. Not now, but at the > right > > > > >time. > > > > > > > > > >RE the right tool for some of the project communications, I have to > > say > > > > >it, > > > > >some of these processes might work really well in Wave...just > sayin'. > > > > > > > > > >John > > > > > > > > > >All the best, > > > > > > > > > >John Blossom > > > > > > > > > >On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Thomas Wrobel <darkfl...@gmail.com > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Is there any suggested way to organize volunteers? > > > > >> > > > > >> I know the current method is basically a "todo" list isnt it? > which > > is > > > > >>fine > > > > >> in itself. > > > > >> But possibly having a list of commiters together with notes of > their > > > > >> skillset could also help. > > > > >> > > > > >> I can, for example do the following; > > > > >> > > > > >> * client side GWT coding. > > > > >> * Android/Java coding > > > > >> * php > > > > >> * 3d graphics and animations (possibly to help > > presentations/diagrams) > > > > >> * film editing > > > > >> * html > > > > >> > > > > >> I haven't a clue when/if any of these things would be usefull - > but > > I > > > > >> wouldn't mind being put on a list for anyone to contact if Wave > > > related > > > > >> help is needed in those areas. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > >> > Forget node.js or any other "world-changer-wannabe" frameworks. > As > > > > >> Michael > > > > >> > states, most developers don't understand (or are even scared of) > > > this > > > > >> > project architecture/structure. Fixing this would be a great > > start! > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 > > > > >> > > > > > >> > I tried to contribute to Wiab, a pretty simple UI modification, > > and > > > I > > > > >> found > > > > >> > myself lost in the code a few hours, nagging poor yuri with > > > questions, > > > > >> > before I could do anything simple (being new to modern web > > > > >>development, > > > > >> > gwt, etc was of no help either). > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> +1 > > > > >> I also tried to do the same thing. Despite being very familiar > with > > > both > > > > >> Java and GWT, and a few web-apps behind me, I still struggled. > > > > >> > > > > >> I haven't seen the codebase in almost a year now, however. > > > > >> > > > > >> Would it benefit from some very simple first steps....like better > > > > >> commenting? removing redundant/legacy stuff? > > > > >> > > > > >> If separating the client is a step too big for anyone to commit > too > > > > >>right > > > > >> now, there might still be more basic messures to help move the > > > existing > > > > >> codebase to something easier to deal with. > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Alain Levesque Wavewatchers > Wavyemailbeta:* > * > *Web Page <http://albonobo.com/> > * >
