bruno, how bout instead of "official" we have a demo server and a testing server for wiab? also if you read up a bit ive already stepped up to offer using my own server for discussion, however its not the most ideal but i have no problem with people using it for that purpose.
again i really dont care which wiab instance on which server we use, just that i would personally like to be talking and testing wiab with all of you :) -fleeky On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Bruno Gonzalez <sten...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Fleeky Flanco <fle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > in that case, could there be a debug server and an official server? > > > Someone correct me if I'm wrong (yuri?), but all wave in a box deployments > are not in any way "official" (even if they may be hyperlinked from the > Apache Wave official website). Specifically, "waveinabox.net" server and > domain is paid for and maintained by Yuri (because one day he decided to > volunteer and do it). > > I have no idea if Apache can let us a share of one of their servers for a > wiab install, but if that's not the case then "we" would have to do it > ourselves. And by "we", I mean that an actual person would have to step > forwards in this mailing list and offer a server for it. I have thought > about doing so myself, I recently tried to deploy wiab in a shared host > where I currently keep my personal website and other stuff, but have had > numerous problems (it's a shared server without root permisions, and my > account gets closed everytime I use too much CPU or disk, so it's difficult > to work like that). > > Does anyone know if Apache could let us a server to use (even if it's a VPS > with just 200mbs of ram... as long as it can run wiab)? > > > > > > -- > Saludos, > Bruno González > > _______________________________________________ > Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com > http://www.stenyak.com >
