On Fri, May 31, 2013, at 08:51 PM, Bruno Gonzalez wrote: > @fleeky: sure, my idea of an "official" server means that people can have > a > stable and reliable way to test "what this wave thingy really is about". > Ideally being hosted in Apache, so that no single person has access to it > (single person = single point of failure in case things go wrong some > day). > > As for "unstable" server, I believe there is not much point in having one > at Apache, unless we also have a stable and unstable branch in the source > code (which I think we don't have at the moment) and we want to let > people > test alpha|beta features. > > Developers will deploy their own servers, so I believe there would be no > need for anything in that regard. > > @grobmeier: awesome stuff, that sounds exactly like what we need. I > usually > hang out on some IRC servers, i'll search their server/room and lurk for > a > while, while we discuss the details here :-) > > @upayavira: nice, thanks for the effort. the server would definitely not > be > running critical service AFAIK, it would be just a technology showcase > for > the general public that may be interested in wave.
At this time, I'd say that if a committer wants to request one, they can create an INFRA ticket on the ASF JIRA, and see what infrastructure can offer. Upayavira
