I'll just sadly from my little lurker corner repeat what I have
been saying
for 3 years or so now;
I wanted to work on a client, despite trying, I lacked the ability to
understand the server side code.
There was never a clear separation of client and sever that I feel
would
have allowed less skilled coders like me to contribute. I was
frustrated
when I saw GWT/ GUI issues on the web client being posted at times to
fix...and I could have helped with that. But I couldn't, because the
bureaucracy of having the sever and client tied together made (for me)
trivial things rather hard.
My half-developed phone client remained dead since Googles time as
well
because I couldn't figure out how to interface with the changes
made to how
you should talk to the sever. I had at one point 3 people helping
me on
that project, and with a client/sever protocol we could have all
contributed.
Ideally two projects and a documented protocol would have been
best. Much
like how email severs and clients can be developed separately, and
standards like pop3 and imap used to talk between them.
I fully acknowledge much of this is my own lack of skills, and with
everyone unpaid volunteers I cant expect anything.
But this is my hypothesis as to why Wave development wasn't as
active as it
could have been.
-Thomas Wrobel
arwave.org
~~~
Thomas & Bertines online review show:
http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
On 14 March 2015 at 21:52, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
Wave has been incubating for some years now, and, unfortunately,
has not
shown a level of growth that, in my opinion, would suggest that it is
likely to reach graduation from the Incubator.
Unfortunately, I think it is time we accept that Wave is unlikely to
reach graduation, and should retire.
To explain what this means - as I understand it, the ASF repo
would be
marked read-only, and after a period of time, the lists disabled.
The code would, however, remain open-source, and any person, or
group of
people would be free to fork the code and continue with it elsewhere,
e.g. Github/Sourceforge/etc.
In the end, this is a decision of the Incubator PMC, however I’d
like to
see whether anyone here has any thoughts to add before I put this
to the
wider Incubator community.
Upayavira
P.S. This came up on the incubator-general list as a part of a
discussion on the Wave report