-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/1/09 2:43 AM, elliottcable wrote:
> I personally am interested in seeing XMPP become not only the > foundation of > the federation protocol, but of the C/S protocol as well. When I first > heard > about Wave, before getting into the Sandbox, I was very excited; it > sounded > like a great idea, based on great tools (XMPP!). Unfortunately, I was > extremely disappointed to find that XMPP really has nothing whatsoever > to do > with Wave, and I’d like to see that remedied. I'd be happy to help with an XMPP binding. > Really, though, any sensible protocol that we can agree on would be > great. > Another option is possibly something involving JSON; that’d make > JavaScript > heavy–clients ridiculously easy to write for the web. JSON is not extensible. IMHO that's going to make it difficult to build anything interesting. Peter - -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkrEv80ACgkQNL8k5A2w/vx8qwCg2ANt/C8kchY+mZ+6VOjK7Uzv EuEAniDWGxRcWI0jxDKNMB8NL0Ek1zvf =OIzs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
