On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Mark Adamcin <[email protected]> wrote: > I understand your point. It's just that XML allows this shorthand syntax in > it's unparsed form. XML parsers (SAX-based parsers, that is) will still read > a self-closing tag as at least two events, the elementStart and elementEnd.
My comments on that section of the spec are more of a nit-pick anyway. I understand why they chose to use "<line></line>text" instead of "<line>text</line>". And, I'm assuming they used "<line/>" instead of "<line></line>" in the spec because it looks cleaner. And reduces the chances that someone will assume that "<line>text</line>" is ok. -Tad --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
