this is the url that works for me in firefox for Echo.java http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/source/browse/src/org/waveprotocol/wave/examples/fedone/agents/echoey/Echoey.java
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Dan Peterson <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey folks, > > > Given the recent push to open up the preview of Google Wave to users ( > http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/09/surfs-up-wednesday-google-wave-update.html), > we wanted to take a moment to provide an update on the overall federation > protocol effort. > > > Short summary: > > > We're continuing to work to open up a server-to-server federation port on > WaveSandbox <http://wavesandbox.com/>.co > <http://wavesandbox.com/>m<http://wavesandbox.com/>, > but, due to production pressures related to our recent preview release, we > are now planning to enable it towards the end of October. We've also been > working to provide more documentation around the wave model, and so we've > produced a draft specification for the wave conversation model: <LINK> > > > Getting deeper into the details: > > > As a number of you in this forum have already noted, we've added support > for agents to FedOne. Agents are the underlying infrastructure for robots as > in the Google Wave APIs ( > http://code.google.com/apis/wave/extensions/robots/index.html). The first > agent we created was "Echoey" which proved useful for debugging federation. > As the name implies that whenever added to a wave will echo a response. > Check it out at: > http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/source/browse/src/org/waveprotocol/wave/examples/fedone/agents/echo/Echo.java > . > > > In order for us to be able to federate WaveSandbox<http://wavesandbox.com/> > .co <http://wavesandbox.com/>m <http://wavesandbox.com/> we have updated > our production systems to support the operations as used in FedOne. This > took us a significant step closer to supporting federation. We expect to > make a few small changes to FedOne in order to allow it to federate with > WaveSandbox <http://wavesandbox.com/>.com <http://wavesandbox.com/>. > > > Please note that once we start federating WaveSandbox<http://wavesandbox.com/> > .co <http://wavesandbox.com/>m <http://wavesandbox.com/>, this will be an > experimental service. This means that we will not have 100% uptime, and will > likely still contain bugs. We also expect that have to perform data > migrations on waves and enhance the federation protocol to allow for more > efficient signing of deltas. > > > Beyond the changes listed in the Google Wave Conversation model roadmap, > the federation protocol will continue to change over the course of the > coming months as well. We are working through some of the quirks in our > production system, including sunsetting some unnecessary (internal) > operations, specifying the format of URIs, and improving ID generation in > waves. Given the cryptographic authentication measures in the federation > protocol, once a wave has been generated (and thus signed), it becomes > impossible to migrate its contents from one underlying format to another. In > order to avoid trapping user data in obsolete formats, the federation port > on wave.google.com is gated on many of the above items. > > > The draft Google Wave Conversation Model specification mentioned above goes > into significant detail about the XML-like format of documents stored in > wavelets. You will note that the FedOne client does not use the document > schema as published above. We expect the FedOne client to only provide > limited support for the new document schema initially. Nonetheless, we > encourage you to inspect it as this is where we are heading. > > > Please take a look at the new spec, and let us know what you think. > > > Cheers, > > -Dan > > > > > > -- Zhao --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
