Hey dude I may be mistaking what your trying to do but I think you are
barking up the wrong tree with this one. Saying wave is good for that is
like saying email is a great way foe two programs to communicate over the
internet. Plus whatever servers are attached to each of your waves would
have to deal with all the data you would throw at it. Maybe look at what
features you like and just build your own server code for your idea. I think
it would take just as long and less chance of problems arising if Google
changed something :)

On Oct 12, 2009 7:17 PM, "ThomasWrobel" <[email protected]> wrote:


I appoligise if this is discused elsewhere, but I just posted this
query on Google Wave API, and was told it might be more suitable for
this thread;


When/how will it be possible for a pc-application to read/write to a
wave directly?
...if it isnt already?
I'm currently playing with robots, and understand they can only be
run
of appengine at the moment. I hear talk they will in future be able
to
be run from any sever.
Would this include just running localy on a client?  login, select
wave post blip, retrieve blip etc. All automaticaly?

The concept I'm working on involves waves being used to exchange,
store, and collaboratively edit in (near) real time non-text based
data. Therefor it makes little sense for the users to see the normal
google wave client.
The specific scenaro is for the use with Augmented Reality
systems...so in most case's this will be phones or even HMD's
displaying 3d meshs at log/lat co-ordinates.
As we are currently working on a roadmap for this development, it
would be nice to see more clearly how a Wave could be viewed and
updated from a local client software rather then a user/browser
directly.


(also, just to be clear, while we are dealing with non-text based
data, nearly
every other feature of the wave protocol is excelent for our usage. In
fact
its utterly fantastic! especialy when permissions are done and replays
a bit more stable)

On 5 okt, 02:10, Joe Developer <[email protected]> wrote: > well,
there is always irc, t...
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Dale Francis <[email protected]
>wrote:

> > > > > If possible i would love to get an account to participate in this
> > discussion in a wave...

> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Michael K <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Oct 3, 20...
> >>https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%2BsyQLkEm6V
<https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com%21w%2BsyQL...>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this
message because you are sub...

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to