oh, but just to clarify, we arnt talking about actually storing massive 3d models on wave. Just the data necessary to geolocate them, using normal http urls as remote resource references. Sever load thus wont be more then ordinary text.
2009/10/13 Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]>: > No, trust me, Wave is very, very perfect for what we are doing. > Obviously, I havnt explained myself too well, but I have been thinking > about this a lot :) > > Its easy to think of Wave as just about text, but text can be used to > represent anything...in this case 3d models. > And how we are handling 3d models. (or rather, how we want too), is > exactly what wave currently does with text. > > Theres numerous advantages of using Wave rather then email to > collaborate with text, and almost all of these translate to 3d too. > (many people editing the same scene at the same time, the ability for > anyone to create a new scene and for anyone else they invite to > contribute is the most obvious ones). > > In some ways you could say a solution more akin to a 3d-wiki might be > more up our street, but then you lose the ability for near-realtime > messages between people. Which is what we want too. (In this case the > messages will be hovering in mid-air, but apart from that basicaly > what wave is doing). > Wave has the advantages of IRC and a Wiki, which makes is great for 3d > world collaboration, and as a base for an open standard for augmented > reality. > > Wave really has huge potential and we are very excited about it. > > Another way to look at it is to look at Gravity, and imagine if the > pieces of the flowchart/mind-map were 3d instead. > > > 2009/10/12 Dale Francis <[email protected]>: >> Hey dude I may be mistaking what your trying to do but I think you are >> barking up the wrong tree with this one. Saying wave is good for that is >> like saying email is a great way foe two programs to communicate over the >> internet. Plus whatever servers are attached to each of your waves would >> have to deal with all the data you would throw at it. Maybe look at what >> features you like and just build your own server code for your idea. I think >> it would take just as long and less chance of problems arising if Google >> changed something :) >> >> On Oct 12, 2009 7:17 PM, "ThomasWrobel" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> I appoligise if this is discused elsewhere, but I just posted this >> query on Google Wave API, and was told it might be more suitable for >> this thread; >> >> >> When/how will it be possible for a pc-application to read/write to a >> wave directly? >> ...if it isnt already? >> I'm currently playing with robots, and understand they can only be >> run >> of appengine at the moment. I hear talk they will in future be able >> to >> be run from any sever. >> Would this include just running localy on a client? login, select >> wave post blip, retrieve blip etc. All automaticaly? >> >> The concept I'm working on involves waves being used to exchange, >> store, and collaboratively edit in (near) real time non-text based >> data. Therefor it makes little sense for the users to see the normal >> google wave client. >> The specific scenaro is for the use with Augmented Reality >> systems...so in most case's this will be phones or even HMD's >> displaying 3d meshs at log/lat co-ordinates. >> As we are currently working on a roadmap for this development, it >> would be nice to see more clearly how a Wave could be viewed and >> updated from a local client software rather then a user/browser >> directly. >> >> >> (also, just to be clear, while we are dealing with non-text based >> data, nearly >> every other feature of the wave protocol is excelent for our usage. In >> fact >> its utterly fantastic! especialy when permissions are done and replays >> a bit more stable) >> >> On 5 okt, 02:10, Joe Developer <[email protected]> wrote: > well, >> there is always irc, t... >> >>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 6:44 AM, Dale Francis >>> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> > > > > If possible i would love to get an account to participate in this >>> > > > > > > discussion in a wave... >> >>> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Michael K <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > > > >> On Sat, Oct 3, 20... >> >>> >>> >> >>https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com!w%2BsyQLkEm6V<https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com%21w%2BsyQL...> >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
