Many of our infrastructure services are implemented as agents, yes. We'd
love to give developers similarly powerful and low-latency access but it's a
much harder problem, in particular with regard to security.
Alex

2009/10/7 Joel Dietz <[email protected]>

> Is an agent the same thing as an infractructure service?
>
> As in the access control white paper:
>
> Delegation allows an account to perform operations with another address as
> the
> author. Google Wave currently uses this for two cases:
>
>    - An account that is a write-member of a group can perform an
>    AddParticipant
>    operation to add an address belonging to that account to a wavelet.
>    - Google
>    Wave's spelling ("Spelly"), linking ("Linky"), and other infrastructure
>    services act on behalf of any address in a wavelet with those services
>    enabled.
>
> ...
>
> This provides Google Wave infrastructure services full access to act as a
> user, while being authenticated as a service account.
>
> And, if so, is the plan to allow developers to write their own
> infrastructure services/agents ?
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Brian May <[email protected]
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 09:59:38AM -0400, Joe Gregorio wrote:
>> > Slide 17 of this presentation shows the relationship between agents and
>> > robots:
>> >
>> >   http://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dggjrx3s_110fkt37dgb
>>
>> Thanks for this.
>>
>> So Spelly and Linky aren't robots, they are agents. As I suspected.
>>
>> (not secret agents I hope ;-)  )
>>
>> What is the justification for this?
>>
>> (some people have expressed concern that a robot might not be the best
>> place to
>> implement a EMail/Wave gateway - so this may be relevant to these
>> discussions)
>> --
>> Brian May <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to