On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Brian May <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 07:53:42PM +1000, Dan Peterson wrote: > > We're continuing to work to open up a server-to-server federation port on > > WaveSandbox <http://wavesandbox.com/>.co > > <http://wavesandbox.com/>m<http://wavesandbox.com/>, > > but, due to production pressures related to our recent preview release, > we > > are now planning to enable it towards the end of October. We've also been > > working to provide more documentation around the wave model, and so we've > > produced a draft specification for the wave conversation model: <LINK> > > Thank you for the update. > > Please don't rush your efforts, I would much prefer the right solution as > opposed to the rushed solution. I think others would agree with me here. > > > Getting deeper into the details: > > > > > > As a number of you in this forum have already noted, we've added support > for > > agents to FedOne. Agents are the underlying infrastructure for robots as > in > > the Google Wave APIs ( > > http://code.google.com/apis/wave/extensions/robots/index.html). The > first > > agent we created was "Echoey" which proved useful for debugging > federation. > > As the name implies that whenever added to a wave will echo a response. > > Check it out at: > > > http://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/source/browse/src/org/waveprotocol/wave/examples/fedone/agents/echo/Echo.java > > Interesting, I have wondered where robots fit into the system. So I guess > it > would look something like > > robot > robot library > server agent library > C/S protocol <--> C/S protocol > > If my ASCII art makes sense to anyone other then myself ;-) > > There might be same layers between robot and robot library I am still not > clear > on. > Slide 17 of this presentation shows the relationship between agents and robots: http://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dggjrx3s_110fkt37dgb Thanks, -joe > > > This means that we will not have 100% uptime, and will > > likely still contain bugs. > > In Office Hours 2009-09-09, Brian Kennish said: > "To misquote Lars, we decided not to have any security or privacy > problems." > > If you decided not to have security or privacy problems, how come you > decided > to have bugs? Wasn't this a bad decision? ;-) > > > The draft Google Wave Conversation Model specification mentioned above > goes > > into significant detail about the XML-like format of documents stored in > > wavelets. You will note that the FedOne client does not use the document > > schema as published above. We expect the FedOne client to only provide > > limited support for the new document schema initially. Nonetheless, we > > encourage you to inspect it as this is where we are heading. > > What implications does this have when using the FedOne client to display > a full-featured wave created with the sandbox? > -- > Brian May <[email protected]> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
