On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Daniel Paull <[email protected]> wrote: > > I really have to disagree here. The OT control algorithm for a Wave > client is far more complicated than that used in the Jupiter system on > which Wave is based. The server acknowledgement was introduced to > allow the server to maintain a single state space rather than a state > space per client. The result being lower memory footprint on the > server at the expense of higher minimum latency between clients and > increased complexity in the OT algorithms. >
Here I will plead ignorance of the Jupiter system (I was unable to find a link to the paper that wasn't paywalled); obviously my mental model of said system is more complex than the actual thing. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
