I'm curious what you'd be seeing as the primary responsibilities of said
fund?

What problems would you want to tackle that Google hasn't on it's 10M+ a
year budget?

On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:28 PM, dougx <[email protected]> wrote:

> Perhaps someone (in the US) could start a kickstarter fund for setting
> up a wave foundation?
>
> Probably best to wait until we get official word from the google guys
> on what's happening, but I'd support a wave foundation to keep this
> stuff going.
>
> ~
> Doug.
>
> On Aug 5, 11:20 pm, ThomasWrobel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Would it be a good idea to have some sort of forum or area for all
> > people/groups currently working on their own WFP servers?
> > Kinda help foster collaboration between them? or to help form a the
> > begins of a foundation?
> > Might be an idea to try to contact all the various groups (pygowave,
> > ruby on sails, Process One..) and get some discussions going.
> >
> > On Aug 5, 3:23 pm, ThomasWrobel <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > I agree with much said.
> > > From my own viewpoint though, it would help if it was a lot easier to
> > > set up Wave servers and federate them.
> > > Part of the USP is its distributed nature, yet there really isn't much
> > > federation going on at all at the moment.
> >
> > > Too many people (imho) saw Wave just as a website. A front end by
> > > google for a "thing" and nothing more.
> > > As soon as theres a few clients (online and standalone), servers and
> > > GUIs about all communicating on the standard I think the whole
> > > concept and power of the WFP would come across much better.
> >
> > > On Aug 5, 5:24 am, James Purser <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > What I would love to see is something like the Apache foundation
> setup
> > > > for Wave. Google to open up as much code as they can and dump it to
> > > > the foundation along with responsibility for the various specs and
> > > > protocols.
> >
> > > > Has anyone heard from Novell or SAP about their own Wave offerings?
> > > > Getting them involved can only help keep the tech and ideas behind
> > > > wave going.
> >
> > > > James
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Wave Protocol" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]<wave-protocol%[email protected]>
> .
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>
>


-- 
Brett Morgan
http://www.google.com/profiles/brett.morgan

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to