Git hub costs above a certain amount of storage doesn't it? Google Code would probably be easiest as it would just continue the same as it is now and would cost nothing.
James On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Brett Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: > Google Code or GitHub? > > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:34 PM, James Purser <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The only thing that would need funding would be hosting of source and >> so on. I don't see any Wave foundation actually hiring people to do >> solid development on Wave, I know the Apache Foundation doesn't pay >> developers or officers. >> >> James >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Wave Protocol" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Brett Morgan > http://www.google.com/profiles/brett.morgan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Wave Protocol" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave Protocol" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
