An interesting note, if we have a "latest" type box, the continuos
build system could push to this box a nightly snapshot or something.

On Nov 19, 10:21 am, Tad Glines <[email protected]> wrote:
> Speaking of "latest". I think that it would make sense to maintain three sub
> domains: latest, stable, demo. In all likelihood, stable and demo would be
> the same version but possibly separate instances. Latest and stable could be
> configured to only reset when the tip or stable tag changes. Demo should
> probably be reset every 24 hours. I'm not sure if it makes sense to enable
> federation on any but the dogfood edition.
>
> I think a domain that more closely identifies with the brand (Wave in a Box)
> would be more appropriate.
> As for where to run it, if someone wants to manage it on the OSU box that's
> fine with me. I'll help if given access.
> I also have an 8 core 16GB ESXi box hosted in a data center across the
> parking lot from where I work. It's a personal box and it's under utilized.
> So, I have no problem hosting the demos there.
>
> -Tad
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Alex North <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Of course, the box is a separate issue to the domain. We could point
> > another domain at the same box. We could use subdomains:
> > latest.acmewave.com:80.
>
> > On 19 November 2010 10:09, Alex North <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> We could run such a service on acmewave.com (on some other port).
>
> >> I think our intent was that acmewave.com:80 would be the "dogfood"
> >> instance - we'd push regularly but once the software reaches some level of
> >> stability we'd attempt to keep the data intact.
>
> >> We could run a "latest" on some other port, refreshing it regularly and
> >> throwing out data at whim. This would save us having another box to
> >> administer.
>
> >> I'll check up on our use of the acmewave.com box (donated by Oregon State
> >> Uni) but it should be reasonable to give some more community members access
> >> to it (Soren?).
>
> >> A.
>
> >> On 19 November 2010 09:32, Tad Glines <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>> My intent was to have a server running at demo.<some-domain>
>
> >>> I really don't care what the domain is as long at it clearly identifies
> >>> what it's a demo of.
>
> >>> I've created a poll in a wave:
> >>>https://wave.google.com/wave/#restored:wave:googlewave.com%252Fw%252B...
>
> >>> Let the voting begin!
>
> >>> Make suggestions and I'll add them to the poll. You can vote for more
> >>> than one item.
>
> >>> -Tad
>
> >>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:10 AM, STenyaK <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>> Maybe it should be something more like wiab-demo.org, or
> >>>> demo.wave-in-the-box.org, or wave-in-the-box.org/demo for the demo
> >>>> itself, and leave wave-in-the-box.org or similar ones for an official
> >>>> wiab homepage?
>
> >>>> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 18:04, antwatkins <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> > Not a bad idea, but wavesandbox.org is taken and I assume Tad wants
> >>>> to
> >>>> > set this up soon, which won't allow us to go with the .com (at least
> >>>> > right now).
>
> >>>> > I like the idea of the poll.
>
> >>>> > One thing to consider is what we refer to this as.  Many people will
> >>>> > have demo servers stood up, but this one has a special purpose and
> >>>> > should be a resource people can depend upon from a community
> >>>> > perspective.  So if we advise someone to go to the Wave box (or
> >>>> > sandbox or whatever else the community comes up with) to experiment
> >>>> > with the latest push, it has a defined meaning.
>
> >>>> > -anthony
>
> >>>> > On Nov 19, 11:52 am, Michael MacFadden <[email protected]>
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>> >> I have two suggestions, what about taking over "wavesandbox.com"
> >>>> from
> >>>> >> google eventually.  Or is wavesandbox.org available?
>
> >>>> >> On Nov 19, 8:42 am, antwatkins <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>> >> > I generally don't like dashes, but I see waveinabox.org and
> >>>> wiab.org
> >>>> >> > is taken. How about we shorten it to wavebox.org. That's available
> >>>> and
> >>>> >> > "in a" aren't really key words.
>
> >>>> >> > Either way I'm happy.  Thanks for setting this up.
>
> >>>> >> > -anthony
>
> >>>> >> > On Nov 19, 11:33 am, Tad Glines <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>>> >> > > I'm thinking of setting up a demo WiaB server on a WiaB domain.
>
> >>>> >> > > The demo server would reset every every 24 hours, would not
> >>>> federate and
> >>>> >> > > would update to tip during each reset.
>
> >>>> >> > > Does anyone have any objections to me purchasing the domain "
> >>>> >> > > wave-in-a-box.org"?
>
> >>>> >> > > -Tad
>
> >>>> > --
> >>>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>> Groups "Wave Protocol" group.
> >>>> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> [email protected]<wave-protocol%2bunsubscr...@goog
> >>>>  legroups.com>
> >>>> .
> >>>> > For more options, visit this group at
> >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Saludos,
> >>>>      Bruno González
>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Jabber: stenyak AT gmail.com
> >>>>http://www.stenyak.com
>
> >>>> --
> >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>>> Groups "Wave Protocol" group.
> >>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>>> [email protected]<wave-protocol%2bunsubscr...@goog
> >>>>  legroups.com>
> >>>> .
> >>>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>
> >>>  --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>> "Wave Protocol" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]<wave-protocol%2bunsubscr...@goog
> >>>  legroups.com>
> >>> .
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.
>
> >  --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Wave Protocol" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<wave-protocol%2bunsubscr...@goog 
> > legroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Wave 
Protocol" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/wave-protocol?hl=en.

Reply via email to